On Inspiration

We encounter very few people in our lives that have the ability to trigger true inspiration in us. Whether they’re a politician, a musician, an artist, a writer, or an athlete, they have the ability to invoke in us a sense of purpose and determination.

            For me, one of these people was movie critic Roger Ebert. I can’t remember the first time I heard his name, but I do remember At the Movies on Sunday mornings on PBS. I was too young to really watch, but even then I was captivated by anything to do with movies.

It was not until 2009, in my junior year of high school that I really started to watch movies. I was in my first filmmaking class and suddenly was able to watch with a completely different eye. It was at this time that I grew tired of the film critic published in the local paper. He was of the kind that trashed a movie for the sake of trashing it. With the Internet at my fingertips I began my search for a new source of opinion. It was then that I remembered At the Movies. I came across Roger’s website one day after school and then spent the evening reading reviews. I didn’t stop at current movies; I searched my mind for my favorite movies and sought out his reviews. I was astonished to find, with a few exceptions, that he and I were aligned in our opinions of many movies and often for the same reasons. I knew I’d found a critic who I could rely on.

Shortly thereafter I began to avidly read his blog, occasionally commenting on posts that I felt I could add an educated opinion to. I bought two of his books and took their recommendations to heart. I found myself able to watch more kinds of movies and able to more articulately voice my thoughts on them. The beauty of Roger’s reviews was not whether or not he liked a movie, but the ways he justified his opinions. I found that even when I didn’t agree with him, I could respect the reasons we disagreed. It’s not uncommon that upon visiting his review of a movie I previously did not favor, I would then be able to watch it in a different, more objective light that opened my eyes to elements I may have been blind to before.

As a student of screenwriting and a reader of film criticism, Roger was a man who I would have loved to meet. For the last four years I’ve longed to attend Ebert Fest, yet have never been able. If only to have had a few moments, to shake his hand, chat, and tell him to keep an eye out for my work in the coming years. One of my goals, perhaps my ultimate goal, was to have received a four star, two thumbs up review from him on something I’ve written. While this goal is no longer achievable, I can still work towards it, taking everything Roger has taught me, using it to shape my writing and the stories I want to tell.

I must take a moment to admit it is abnormal of me to feel so deeply a sense of loss over someone I’ve never met. It is a feeling I experienced first only two weeks ago, while, in London, I visited the former home of another hero of mine, Freddie Mercury. As I stood at the wall of his Kensington home and took in the messages of love and appreciation left by followers all unified by the fact that a great and talented man was taken too soon, I found myself overcome. It was sudden and unexpected. I had never reacted like this to someone outside of my family. It was at that moment that I realized that when a person, even a person you never have or never will meet, has a such deep and lasting impact on your life and spirit, they become more than a celebrity, more than musician, more than a film critic. They become a part of who you are as a person. Both Roger and Freddie have had this effect on me.

When I opened my computer today, on a break during my TV writing class, I saw the news that Roger had died. I was shocked and immediately saddened. Just two hours before in an email to my girlfriend, I had expressed my hopes that he would recover from this latest bout with cancer. Just yesterday I read his blog post about it and was left hopeful by his always positive demeanor and upbeat outlook. Perhaps this is why I feel so strongly. But I take solace knowing that his legacy will continue. He had plans for the future and I know they will still come to fruition, though the work of his loving wife Chaz, colleague, Richard, and his “Far Flung Correspondents.” They will continue his work, keeping true to his love of film.

As for me? I will carry on. I will keep writing and keep watching, ever mindful of what I’ve learned from Roger’s reviews, blog posts, and books. And of course, I will continue to check in on his website, every Thursday as I have done for four years, ready to know what’s good, and what’s not, at the movies.

I believe that if, at the end, according to our abilities, we have done something to make others a little happier, and something to make ourselves a little happier, that is about the best we can do. To make others less happy is a crime. To make ourselves unhappy is where all crime starts. We must try to contribute joy to the world. That is true no matter what our problems, our health, our circumstances. We must try. I didn’t always know this and am happy I lived long enough to find it out.” Roger Ebert in Life Itself

2 notes

I think it goes without saying that this is one not to be missed.

2 notes

Now that’s what I’m talking about.

As one of the few people I know who still cherishes Superman over Batman in the DC universe, I’ve had a hard time of late conveying my reasoning to hordes of recent fans who judge all super heroes on the Nolan-Batman scale. Sure, the older Superman movies and even Superman Returns lacked the gritty hardness of the Batman reboots, but that’s because Superman was never a particularly dark character. Don’t get me wrong, I loved the Dark Knight movies and the fresh direction in which Nolan took the character, but it is ultimately a direction best used for Batman. Batman covers his face, comes out at night, and fights from the shadows. Supes doesn’t wear a mask (although he rocks a curl), has no qualms about showing up during the lunch hour, and generally faces his opponent down (yes, I know Batman’s lack of invincibility makes this impractical).

Yes, Zack Snyder’s take on the character is darker, but not so much on the grit level as the emotional. That’s the main misconception of the Dark Knight. People see those films and think, “wow, that was gritty, I loved it.” But what they don’t realize is what they loved was the way Nolan took an absurd premise with a larger than life character and framed it within a real emotional context. Everyone can relate to grief and anger, and when that’s used as a tool for the formation of one of their favorite heroes, it hits home. Suddenly, the man dressed as a Bat is relatable on a previously unheard of level. The grittiness of the films stems from that continued realism.

With Superman it gets more complicated. He isn’t a man dressed up in a suit, he’s an alien in a suit dressed up as a man. Kal-El is essentially a god amongst men. He can fly, shoot lasers, see through walls, is invincible, the list goes on. How in the hell do you make that relatable? From the look of the trailer, and from what I’ve read about the story so far, Snyder and David S. Goyer nailed it on the head. Clark grows up different from everyone he knows. Yes, his abilities and true parentage may be a secret to everyone else, but he sure as hell knows he’s an outsider. Now who here has ever felt, at some point during their lives, that they were an outcast, or were too different to be a part of society? Exactly. There you have, despite the fact he’s an alien, a very relatable emotional hook for Clark’s character. Clark’s navigation of these emotions and his eventual evolution into Superman form the centerpiece of the new film. Sure it doesn’t look as dark and gloomy or as gritty as the Dark Knight films were, but that’s just not who Superman is. Frankly, I think the movie looks awesome. From this first look it’s exactly what I’d hope for from a new Superman movie. All the pieces are there, even Perry White running from some destruction!

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go watch the trailer again.

4 notes

This actually took me a few minutes.

This actually took me a few minutes.

1 note

My summer thus far. It’s not like I have anything better to spend my time and money on…

6 notes

Yet more Oscar fodder in the form of Glenn Close playing a woman playing a man in Albert Nobbs. Initially I wasn’t too excited for this but the trailer gives a nice taste of what is surely Close’s career defining performance. Check it out and tell me what you think.

First trailer I’ve seen for My Week With Marilyn. Despite my original doubts I really enjoyed what I saw. Michelle Williams looks like she can pull it off and I appreciate that a relatively unknown actor is cast as the male lead. A risky decision for drawing in American audiences, although that can be achieved easily enough by Williams and the supporting cast which includes some classic names and a few up and comers, including Emma Watson in her first post Potter role.

I’m willing to bet there could be some Oscar fodder here, especially in Williams.

4 notes

The first official trailer from Clint Eastwood’s long anticipated J. Edgar. From what it shown, it looks like Eastwood will, as usual, deliver the goods.

And LOL at Leo’s voice. I always enjoy the “accents” and “dialects” he picks up for parts. I hope this movie wont make me laugh as hard as Shutter Island and The Departed did.

2 notes

Another great Muppets trailer parody. Cannot wait for this movie.

3 notes

Let’s face it, when Warner Brothers announced in the early spring that Zack Snyder (fresh off the crash and burn failure of Sucker Punch) would be directing the new Superman movie Man of Steel, none of us were quite as comfortable with the decision as we would have been before seeing Sucker Punch. I personally love Superman. I think he is one of those cultural symbols rooted so deeply into us that we will always be adapting and updating him. Therefore it was inevitable that we’d be seeing him again on the big screen only seven years after his last foray with Lex Luther.
Penned by the Batman Begins scribe, David S. Goyer, Man of Steel promises to be something we haven’t seen before. Personally I’m hoping for some sort of Nolan treatment of Superman but with Snyder’s sense of style and atmosphere that made Watchmen so interesting to watch. It’ll be nice to see Snyder back in his comfort zone of remakes and adaptations.
The photo above is a first look at Brit, Henry Cavill in the blue and red tights. Though you might notice that the tights now have a more modern sheen to them. Could Superman be sporting a new material? I wouldn’t be opposed to that. Just don’t go the Green Lantern route and try to CGI a suit on.
I like the suit and I think Cavill has the brawn and the charm for the Man of Steel. The question is whether or not he can pull off the clumsy Clark Kent as well.
What do you think of this Man of Steel?

Let’s face it, when Warner Brothers announced in the early spring that Zack Snyder (fresh off the crash and burn failure of Sucker Punch) would be directing the new Superman movie Man of Steel, none of us were quite as comfortable with the decision as we would have been before seeing Sucker Punch. I personally love Superman. I think he is one of those cultural symbols rooted so deeply into us that we will always be adapting and updating him. Therefore it was inevitable that we’d be seeing him again on the big screen only seven years after his last foray with Lex Luther.

Penned by the Batman Begins scribe, David S. Goyer, Man of Steel promises to be something we haven’t seen before. Personally I’m hoping for some sort of Nolan treatment of Superman but with Snyder’s sense of style and atmosphere that made Watchmen so interesting to watch. It’ll be nice to see Snyder back in his comfort zone of remakes and adaptations.

The photo above is a first look at Brit, Henry Cavill in the blue and red tights. Though you might notice that the tights now have a more modern sheen to them. Could Superman be sporting a new material? I wouldn’t be opposed to that. Just don’t go the Green Lantern route and try to CGI a suit on.

I like the suit and I think Cavill has the brawn and the charm for the Man of Steel. The question is whether or not he can pull off the clumsy Clark Kent as well.

What do you think of this Man of Steel?

4 notes

Empire Big Screen ‘11

I’ve been seeing lots of reports from Empire Big Screen ‘11 this weekend and I’ve noticed a trend amongst the reports. Most people reporting seem to be under the assumption that we all have access to the footage they are being exclusively shown. Like this article from IndieWire:

“More happily, we were also shown the Comic-Con footage for “The Amazing Spider-Man,” and to reiterate what many said in San Diego, those who dismissed it based on that underwhelming teaser trailer may want to think again.”

I mean what are we supposed to base our opinions on? We’ve only been shown two minutes of mediocre footage that ended with a videogame sequence.

2 notes

LATE SUMMER!

I saw something on the coverage of Doctor Who at Comic Con that says the show will be back in Late Summer.

It took me almost an entire minute to realize that it’s almost August. August qualifies as Late Summer…!

Hallelujah!

I’m so effing excited!

5 notes